Abortion is Legal -- is Infanticide Next?

from Martin Fox, President
National Pro-Life Alliance


Ever since Roe v. Wade legalized abortion-on-demand in 1973, 61 million babies have been sentenced to brutal deaths.

Yet according to so-called medical ethicists Giubilini and Minerva . . . Roe v. Wade’s policy of abortion-on-demand isn’t nearly extreme enough.

They are not satisfied for abortionists to merely end babies’ lives through all nine months of pregnancy . . .

. . . they want abortionists to end babies’ lives AFTER birth as well.

And although they readily admit that both born and unborn babies “certainly are humans,” they still advocate for a mother’s so-called “choice” to end those humans’ lives, before and after birth, claiming that newborns place a “financial, psychological, or social” burden on mothers.

In fact, Giubilini and Minerva credit Roe v. Wade as the inspiration behind their cruel philosophy, writing:

"The same arguments that apply to killing a human fetus can also be consistently applied to killing a newborn human."

"When circumstances occur after birth such that they would have justified abortion, what we call after-birth abortion should be permissible."

But born or unborn, killing babies is wrong.

 

The National Pro-Life Alliance occupies a unique and important role in the pro-life movement. The focus of many other pro-life organizations is research, publications or counseling. These are all important and worthy activities, but the National Pro-Life Alliance is singular in its focus on passing pro-life legislation that will protect the unborn from the moment of conception onward. For more information on the National Pro-Life Alliance or to make a donation, please use this link.