Voices for Life Is a blog dedicated to informing and educating the public on pro-life and pro-family issues.
Our focus is to protect the sanctity of all human life from conception until natural death. This includes protecting babies from abortion, fetal tissue experimentation, and embryonic research; and the general population from euthanasia, cloning, population control and human genetic engineering.
Pages
▼
Friday, February 1, 2013
National Organization for Marriage Criticizes President's Decision to Divide Nation Over Marriage on Inauguration Day
Washington, D.C. — Brian Brown, President of the
National Organization for Marriage (NOM), criticized President Obama’s
decision to use his Inauguration Day address to further divide the
nation on the question of what is marriage. The President chose to make a
veiled reference to redefine marriage when he said "our journey is not
complete until our gay brothers and sisters are treated like anyone else
under the law."
"Gay and lesbian people are already treated equally under the law,"
Brian Brown responded. "They have the same civil rights as anyone else;
they have the right to live as they wish and love whom they choose. What
they don’t have is the right to redefine marriage for all of society.
In fact, six federal courts have rejected the idea that there is a
constitutional right to same-sex marriage, including the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Eighth Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court in a summary
decision in 1972. Furthermore, that vast majority of states have
codified the commonsense view held for thousands of years that marriage
is the union of a man and a woman. The President is profoundly wrong to
imply that those who have acted to protect marriage have denied anyone's
rights by doing so."
Brown continued: "A presidential inauguration should be a time for
the nation to come together; instead President Obama chose to voice his
support for a radical agenda advanced by some of his biggest campaign
contributors to redefine marriage for everyone. Marriage brings our
nation together. The concept of gay ‘marriage’ would have been totally
alien to our founding fathers, and the protection and advancement of
marriage between one man and one woman will immeasurably serve the
common good of this country and further strengthen our Union. Today the
President should have thrown his support behind this beautiful vision of
men and women coming together in love to raise the next generation.
Nonetheless, we pro-marriage Americans pledge to defend the institution
which the President has chosen to undermine once again."
No comments:
Post a Comment