Showing posts with label Abortion Advocate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Abortion Advocate. Show all posts

Sunday, October 22, 2017

Abortion Advocate Complains Pro-Lifers Dominate Social Media: “They’re Winning as a Result”


By Tony Perkins, President Family Research Council
Life News

Pro-lifers aren’t just winning in Washington, D.C. and state houses around America. They’re winning online! The virtual fronts of the internet and social media are changing the debate for life every day. Don’t believe me? Ask pro-abortion activist Robin Marty.

The columnist for Dame wrote a surprisingly encouraging column about the domination of the pro-life movement on the internet (“They’re killing it on Twitter!”). “Abortion opponents use the social media platform like a weapon, and with absolute precision,” she says, “and they’re winning as a result.”

“From turning the trial of Kermit Gosnell from a local crime story to a national rallying cry against dangerous rogue abortion providers to forcing Planned Parenthood into instant crisis mode within moments of the first so-called ‘baby parts’ videos hitting the internet, the anti-abortion movement doesn’t just use social media as a highly effective tool: It is a literal weapon in their hands. 
"Over the last few years, the movement has successfully trended hashtag after hashtag, using them to push media coverage on Supreme Court cases, abortion bans, even bubbles of mainstream news coverage of the annual March for Life.”

Marty says she was so intrigued that she decided to go straight to the source and ask how pro-lifers got to be “so good at this.” A lot of movement leaders credit the young generation of pro-lifers. According to one, pro-lifers have “far more young activists in their base, which gives them more social media power — and they also benefit from having so many stay-at-home mothers… who aren’t working and who can be ready to hit Twitter with a message when asked.”

But, Marty thinks, the answer may be the closeness of the community, which is bound and determined to protect life. 

“What it all boils down to is that what really makes the anti-abortion movement’s Twitter campaigns (or Twitter derailing campaigns) so successful is that their leaders all work cohesively together across the boards on them, turning several groups into one large social media unit.” It’s a cohesion, she says, that’s “often lacking in the world of pro-abortion rights activists, and one that is probably unlikely to ever exist.”


Friday, August 4, 2017

Abortionist Jane Hodgson: “Pregnancy is a Disease” and Abortion is the Cure


By Dave Andrusko
Life News


Come an anniversary, the publication of yet another pro-abortion rehash of the “history of abortion rights,” a partial eclipse of the sun, whatever it takes, large or small, we can be sure that journalists will find a reason to periodically celebrate pro-abortion “pioneers.”

Of course those laudatory profiles no longer include Dr. Bernard Nathanson, co-founder of the predecessor to NARAL Pro-Choice America, or Norma McCorvey, the “Roe” of Roe v. Wade. Both were converts to the pro-life side. Thus they have been airbrushed out of the glorious history of “abortion rights” just as politicians no longer in favor used to be expunged from official Soviet portraits.

This all came to mind when I ran across a piece today that appeared in City Pages, a small publication in my home town of Minneapolis. Its lament was captured in the headline–“How hospitals outsourced America’s abortion controversy”–to Mike Mullen’s story but its real objective was (yet again) to celebrate the wonderfulness of the late Minnesota abortionist Jane Hodgson.

She is a favorite for many reasons. The legend of Jane Hodgson is that this “mild mannered woman” was radicalized by the plight of pregnant women pre-Roe v. Wade, going from opposing abortion to become a staunch champion of reproductive rights.

Her fate as a pro-abortion heroine was sealed when she became (as the New York Times put it) “the first American doctor charged for an abortion performed in a hospital.” She knew she would be charged; Minnesota’s abortion law in 1970 was, like most state’s, very protective.

Hodgson shrewdly chose to challenge the laws by aborting a woman who had contracted rubella during her pregnancy. There was built-in sympathy; babies whose mothers had rubella (German Measles) could be born with very serious birth complications.

She received a minor punishment that was put on hold pending appeal. When Roe v. Wade was handed down, her conviction was overturned. She never served a day in jail and took up a “second career” as one of the most familiar faces of the pro-abortion movement.

For 30 years Hodgson was a lead plaintiff or expert witness in numerous court battles,” Mullens writes. “She sided against laws mandating the consent of parents for minors seeking abortions,” to name just one example.