Showing posts with label National Right to Life News Today. Show all posts
Showing posts with label National Right to Life News Today. Show all posts

Friday, August 29, 2014

The beauty of life’s continuum



By Christine Flowers
National Right to Life News Today


Recently, I’ve had occasion to contemplate the value of life at its extreme edges. I’m talking about the moments when we see it bursting into the world, fresh from its mother’s womb, “trailing clouds of glory,” as Wordsworth wrote.

I’m also talking, and personally, about those moments when life is a faint shadow of that former glory, the final moments of a magnificent life that is on the verge of ending. To me, humanity is not measured by what we look like, what we are able to contribute, our ability to speak, feel, see or create. To me, life simply exists on a beautiful continuum, and each stage of that continuum is precious.

In my mother’s last days, she was as dear to me, if not more, than when we took that trip together to Paris and London, and shared laughter, beauty and croissants. As I approached losing her, my appreciation for her weighty presence in my own life took on exponentially greater proportions.



Monday, August 4, 2014

“Chloe’s Law” will Provide Expectant Mothers with Information about Down Syndrome



By Mark Bradford, President,
Jérôme Lejeune Foundation, USA

Pennsylvania’s law, as is true with the majority of other state laws, reflects the common ground first established in the 2008 federal legislation, the Prenatally and Postnatally Diagnosed Conditions Awareness Act. That Act was co-sponsored by Senators Kennedy and Brownback, again showing the common ground agreement that women should receive all of the information recommended by professional guidelines.On July 18, Pennsylvania Governor Tom Corbett signed into law the “Down Syndrome Prenatal and Postnatal Education Act” commonly known as “Chloe’s Law.” Pennsylvania became the 7th state to implement legislation intended to provide to new and expectant parents “Up-to-date, evidence-based information about Down syndrome that has been reviewed by medical experts and national Down syndrome organizations” and also “contact information regarding First Call programs and support services.”
The need for Chloe’s law is two-fold: [1] the Kennedy-Brownback Act has never been funded or implemented, which is why states have taken on state-level measures; and [2] while professional guidelines recommend offering prenatal testing for Down syndrome to all patients, those same guidelines recommend that patients receive up-to-date, accurate information about Down syndrome and referral to parent support organizations, but that is not happening with the same regularity as the offering of prenatal testing.


Sunday, April 6, 2014

WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO BE PRO-LIFE?

Every Human Being Matters, and We Ought to Act Accordingly




By Paul Stark
National Right to Life News Today

The media often use the label “anti-abortion” to describe pro-life advocates. It’s true that we oppose abortion—and infanticide, euthanasia and embryo-destructive research. But we are only against those things because we are for something else.
What we are for
What are we for? We are for the proposition that human life is good, that it is worth living, that it deserves respect and protection. We are for the proposition that every human being has an equal worth and dignity—that every human being has a right to live.
The pro-life position rejects all attempts to divide humanity into those who have rights and those who don’t. Our society now recognizes that past discrimination on the basis of race, gender, ethnicity and social status was deeply unjust. We recognize that the worth of a human being does not depend on such characteristics.
Nor, however, does the worth of a human being depend on age, size, ability, dependency, stage of development or the desires and decisions of others. The big are not more valuable than the small. The strong do not have more rights than the weak. The independent do not matter more than the vulnerable and needy.
No, we have value and a right to life simply because we are human—not because of what we can do, but because of what (the kind of being) we are. That’s why everyone matters. Everyone counts.
This article was first published in MCCL News, the newspaper of Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, NRLC’s state affiliate.

Sunday, February 2, 2014

So Many Empty Chairs

Editor’s note. This delightful story appeared in the January issue of National Right to Life News which can be read in its entirety online  using this link.  Be sure to pass this along to all your pro-life family and friends.


 by Joleigh Little
Region Coordinator and Teens for Life Director, Wisconsin Right to Life

Numbers.
 
So not my thing.

I prefer letters that make words which become sentences. In fact, I love them. And while abortion can be explained in words, opposed in words and, eventually, eradicated with words, I don’t think it can be adequately understood without the numbers.

Knowing this, I tried to wrap my tiny fourteen year old brain around the numbers. It was 1985. I’d just marked the 12th anniversary of Roe v. Wade – my first as a full-fledged right-to-life advocate.

Our cold Wisconsin winter morphed into spring and one rainy Saturday when I was home alone I decided to try to not only understand the vastness of the abortion tragedy, but to help explain it to others.

I knew that abortion killed 1.5 million children a year (thankfully considerably lower now). I figured I would pull out the old stack of catalogs on our living room shelf and cut out the faces of the kids in the children’s clothing section. Logic dictated that after a good, hard day’s work I would be well on my way. My goal was a display banner that would show the tragedy of abortion.

A simple banner with 1.5 million faces on it. (I laugh now and understand the frustration my math teachers felt all those years.)

So I got out my scissors, stacked up three or four massive catalogs alongside my paper, glue and paintbrush, and I went at it. I cut carefully around tiny faces. I left entire legions of child models headless. I cut for hours, amassing what I was certain was a large dent in my project.

Once all of the catalogs were depleted, I decided to tally them up. I knew I’d probably have to borrow a few more catalogs to get the job done, but I was pretty sure I was well on my way. I counted the faces.

continue reading at http://www.nationalrighttolifenews.org

Monday, January 27, 2014

Republican National Committee Affirms That Pro-Life Is A Winning Position

COUNSELS PRO-LIFE CANDIDATES NOT TO STAY SILENT
WHEN ATTACKED WITH “WAR ON WOMEN” RHETORIC

By Dave Andrusko

Gathering in Washington, DC for the Republican National Committee’s winter meeting, the RNC overwhelmingly passed a resolution today that says the party “will support Republican pro-life candidates who fight back against Democratic deceptive ‘war on women’ rhetoric by pointing out the extreme positions on abortion held by Democratic opponents.” The resolution explicitly rejects those who would counsel pro-life GOP candidates and their campaigns to adopt “a strategy of silence on the abortion issue when candidates are attacked.”

The “Resolution on Republican Pro-Life Strategy” was drafted by Delaware National Committeewoman Ellen Barrosse and co-sponsored by 15 other RNC members. It passed the RNC’s Resolutions Committee unanimously on Wednesday and easily today.

“RNC leaders delayed the start of the meeting this week so that they could march alongside activists in the annual March for Life rally, signaling that the party is embracing and highlighting their stance on abortion, which has been taken up by state legislatures across the country,” according to Nia-Malika Henderson, writing on the Washington Post’s she-the-people blog.
 


Sunday, January 26, 2014

NYC PREGNANCY CENTERS WIN FREE SPEECH APPEAL

Linda Marzulla, far left, a pregnancy counselor, consoles a client at the EMC Pregnancy Center, in Brooklyn, N.Y.

By Emil Belz

NEW YORK—On January 17, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals tossed out key parts of New York City’s law requiring pregnancy centers to post signs saying they do not offer abortion referrals. That provision is a violation of the centers’ free speech, the court ruled.

The three-judge panel’s unanimous ruling was a substantial, but mixed, victory for the pregnancy centers. A lower federal judge had tossed out the city law in its entirety. The 2nd Circuit reinstated a portion of the law that requires centers to disclose whether they have medical personnel on staff. The ruling paralleled a 4th Circuit ruling on a similar law in Maryland.

In striking down the city law’s sign requirement, the 2nd Circuit ruled the law “requires centers to mention controversial services that some pregnancy services centers, such as plaintiffs in this case, oppose.”The ruling continued: “A requirement that pregnancy services centers address abortion, emergency contraception, or prenatal care at the beginning of their contact with potential clients alters the centers’ political speech by mandating the manner in which the discussion of these issues begins. … The centers must be free to formulate their own address.”

continue reading at http://www.nationalrighttolifenews.org



Sunday, December 15, 2013

Congresswoman’s “Miracle Baby” Now At Home



Defies Predictions That Baby Was “Beyond Hope”

 By Dave Andrusko

Abigail will be home for Christmas!

The story of Congresswoman Jaime Herrera Beutler’s “miracle baby” was one of the true feel-good stories of 2013. Now the baby that was given no chance to live was released this week to go home to Camas, Washington, after spending months on dialysis in a California hospital.

“We are so grateful to the medical team at Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital (in Palo Alto, Calif.) for their care of Abigail during her first months of life,” Herrera Beutler said. She also asked for “continued patience and prayers in the coming weeks as our family adjusts to life back home.”

For newcomers to the story, Jaime and her husband Daniel had received devastating news when they came in for a routine ultrasound: their baby—their first—had a fatal condition (Potter’s Syndrome) for which nothing could be done.

Abigail was thought to be beyond hope because babies with Potter’s Syndrome lack amniotic fluid, which is crucial for lung and kidney development.

continue reading at http://www.nationalrighttolifenews.org



Wednesday, November 20, 2013

The Vicious, Unceasing Pro-abortion Attack on CPCs

By Dave Andrusko

 This will be a very short post. There is only so much one can say about the pro-abortionist’s irrational hatred of crisis pregnancy centers.

Of course, in one way, it makes perfect sense. Every child that escapes the clutches of your friendly Planned Parenthood abortion clinic is lost revenue. And even in a non-profit that rakes in over $1 billion a year in revenue, you can’t be too careful. A saved baby here, a saved baby there and, darn, Planned Parenthood’s income might be down to a mere $1 billion.

The latest all-out assault was posted (of course) at Rhrealitycheck.org. Andrea Grimes, Senior Political Reporter, is incensed. The first two paragraphs simply explain how the money was raised and where it is going:

“Tens of thousands of dollars raised from sales of newly authorized ‘Choose Life’ license plates in Texas will go to 13 crisis pregnancy centers and adoption agencies, as part of an effort ‘to encourage adoption as an alternative to abortion.’



Pro-abortion Coalition Unveils Sweeping New National Abortion-on-Demand Legislation in Congress







WASHINGTON (November 20, 2013) – A large group of pro-abortion members of Congress have introduced sweeping new legislation that is intended to nullify virtually all state and federal limitations on abortion, at any point in pregnancy.

Major pro-abortion groups, including the Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA), NARAL Pro-choice America, and the Center for Reproductive Rights, immediately began promoting the bill in communications to pro-abortion activists and in their fundraising appeals.

The bill reflects the alarm in pro-abortion activist ranks at the legislative successes of the pro-life movement in many state legislatures in recent years – including, for example, enactment of the NRLC-crafted Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act in 10 states.

The new 15-page proposal is formally titled the “Women’s Health Protection Act.” It was introduced on November 13 in the Senate as S. 1696 by Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-Ct.) and 30 cosponsors, all Democrats. Identical companion legislation (H.R. 3471) was introduced in the House of Representatives by Rep. Judy Chu (D-Ca.) and 59 cosponsors, all Democrats.

Blumenthal called it “a clear and certain response to” a “cascading wave of restrictions” on abortion enacted by state legislatures over the past several years.

In a letter promoting the bill released November 13, PPFA, NARAL, and numerous other pro-abortion groups asserted that “states enacted a recordbreaking 92 restrictions on abortion in 2011, and over 100 additional dangerous and unnecessary measures have passed into law since then.”

continue reading at http://www.nationalrighttolifenews.org


 
 
 

Monday, November 18, 2013

The Abortion Accounts Of 26 Women Weep Pain And Regret And Remorse


By Dave Andrusko

 When there is even an ounce of honesty in them, any series of accounts of women who have undergone abortions will accomplish exactly the opposite of what proponents of “telling your story” believe it will. Instead of “de-stigmatizing” abortion, it makes the average person even more skeptical of abortion, even more convinced it is a horrible “choice.”

The latest example is a story in New York magazine which provided thumbnail sketches of the reasons 26 women had their abortion or abortions (see n0ymag.com/news/features/abortion-stories-2013-11/?mid=nymag_press).

The overwhelming takeaway I had was sorrow. Abortion’s ugly truth is everywhere.

I was very much impressed with the introduction written by Meaghan Winter. Take this paragraph, for example:
“And yet abortion is something we tend to be more comfortable discussing as an abstraction; the feelings it provokes are too complicated to face in all their particularities. Which is perhaps why, even in doggedly liberal parts of the country, very few people talk openly about the experience, leaving the reality of abortion, and the emotions that accompany it, a silent witness in our political discourse. Even now, four decades after Roe, some of the women we spoke with would talk only if we didn’t print their real names.”

Again, I understand that the whole point is that the more often women tell their stories, in theory the less “stigma” will attach. But it’s not stigma that is running roughshod in many of their hearts but deep, DEEP regret. Which is why if you take the time to read all the stories, you come away aching for almost all of these women.

I will just cite three stories + a closing quotation from a fourth(but please read them all at nymag.com/news/features/abortion-stories-2013-11/?mid=nymag_press).

continue reading at http://www.nationalrighttolifenews.org



Sunday, November 10, 2013

“Hero dog” rescues abandoned newborn, baby girl doing well


By Dave Andrusko

 68-year-old Roger Wilday was walking his German Shepherd when Jade suddenly made a beeline toward some bushes in the Marlborough House Community Park in Birmingham, England. Wilday, a grandfather, beckoned the nine-year-old dog back but, according to the Birmingham Mail, Jade “laid down next to what appeared to be a discarded carrier bag and refused to return to her owner’s side.”

“She wouldn’t come back when I called her and so I had to go over and I saw the bag,” Wilday told the Daily Star. “I walked over and saw a carrier bag – then I saw it move,” Wilday said. “I thought it was a bag of kittens, but then I saw her little arms and a head, and the baby started to cry.’’

continue reding at http://www.nationalrighttolifenews.org/

Friday, November 1, 2013

Medical Student Confronts Abortion, Becomes Pro-life


By Sarah Terzo

Abortion becomes very real when it is seen instead of viewed as an abstract moral and political debate.
Some time ago, I was sent this testimony from a medical student who preferred not to leave a name. He had just witnessed an abortion as part of his training. Deeply troubled, he wanted to tell someone. He was haunted by what he had seen.

The student starts out by saying that he was firmly in the pro-choice camp before witnessing the abortion:

“To begin, I must say that until yesterday, Friday, July 2, 2004, I was strongly pro-choice. I am a pre-medical student, and being very scientific, I understood that the mass of cells that forms the fetal body is not often capable of survival before 24 weeks in the womb. I am also somewhat liberal, and I believed that every woman should have the right to choose what she did with her body and one that could potentially be growing inside of her.”

The student had heard the pro-choice movement’s slogans. He took them at face value, believing that the unborn baby was “a mass of cells” and not an individual human being. He felt that a woman “had the right to control her body” and did not sympathize with the tiny baby inside her. He did not believe in the child’s humanity or right to life.

Then he took the opportunity to see an abortion performed. Because of his pro-choice beliefs, he did not expect to be disturbed by anything he would see:

“This summer, I was accepted into a pre-medical program in NYC in which we are allowed to shadow doctors and see all sorts of medical procedures. When given the opportunity to see an abortion, I did not hesitate to accept the offer. It was something new, edgy, and exciting that I had never seen.”

He then describes exactly what he witnessed in the operating room:

“When I entered the operating room, it felt like any other I had ever been in. On the table in front of me, I saw a woman, legs up as if delivering a child although she was asleep. Next to her was a tray of instruments for the abortion and a vacuum machine for suctioning the fetal tissues from the uterus. The doctors put on their gowns and masks and the procedure began. The cervix was held open with a crude metal instrument and a large transparent tube was stuck inside of the woman. Within a matter of seconds, the machine’s motor was engaged and blood, tissue, and tiny organs were pulled out of their environment into a filter. A minute later, the vacuum choked to a halt. The tube was removed, and stuck to the end was a small body and a head attached haphazardly to it, what was formed of the neck snapped. The ribs had formed with a thin skin covering them, the eyes had formed, and the inner organs had begun to function. The tiny heart of the fetus, obviously a little boy, had just stopped — forever. The vacuum filter was opened, and the tiny arms and legs that had been torn off of the fetus were accounted for. The fingers and toes had the beginnings of their nails on them. The doctors, proud of their work, reassembled the body to show me. Tears welled up in my eyes as they removed the baby boy from the table and shoved his body into a container for disposal.”


 Editor’s note. Sarah Terzo is a pro-life author and creator of the clinicquotes.com website. She is a member of Secular Pro-Life and PLAGAL. This appeared at liveactionnews.org.





Thursday, October 31, 2013

Congressman Smith Comments on Sebelius’s Remarks About Not Knowing Which Insurance Plans Will Pay for Abortions

Congressman Chris Smith

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Congressman Chris Smith (NJ-04) today released the following statement regarding Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius’s remarks that she did not know which plans on the federal exchange will pay for abortions during testimony on Capitol Hill.

“It is an outrage—it doesn’t pass the straight face test and it’s just not believable—that at this stage Sebelius cannot, or will not, tell consumers how to find out whether the plans they are considering include abortions that painfully dismember or chemically poison unborn children,” said Smith, a 32-year member of Congress and co-chairman of the Bipartisan Congressional Prolife Caucus.

continue reading at http://www.nationalrighttolifenews.org



JUDGE WILL RULE BY TUESDAY ON PP REQUEST FOR STAY OF NEW RULE ON WEB-CAM ABORTIONS

By Dave Andrusko

Judge Karen Romano said this morning that she will rule by Tuesday on a request by Planned Parenthood of the Heartland for a stay of a rule instituted by the Iowa Board of Medicine that abortionists must be physically present when dispensing chemical abortifacients to pregnant women.

At issue is what the Board sees as a matter of safety and PPH sees as an impediment to its relentless campaign to expand abortion into rural areas.

The hearing comes two days after Austin-based U.S. District Judge Lee Yeakel ruled on portions of Texas’s pro-life HB 2. In this context the relevant point is that Judge Yeakel said nothing to challenge the law’s requirement that the abortionist “must examine the pregnant woman,” which is not done in web-cam abortions.

PPH has asked Romano first to impose a temporary stay on the rule (adopted August 30), then to overturn it permanently. This morning’s hearing in Polk County District Court focused on the request for a stay. Unless a stay is granted, the rule goes into effect November 6.

continue reading at http://www.nationalrighttolifenews.org



Saturday, October 26, 2013

Study Shows Children with Spina Bifida Fare Better with in Utero Surgery


By Dave Andrusko

Over the last few months we have run several stories about in utero surgery. To this day there remain some skeptics. Their numbers are diminishing, however, as there is much research that demonstrates (for example) how babies with spina bifida will benefit when surgeons correct their problem before they are born.

One of the best examples was a study in the New England Journal of Medicine. A while back “ABC News Tonight” did a wonderful job putting a human face on that study and the benefits of that surgery.

A smiling news anchor Diane Sawyer began

“We have medical news now. the result of a surgical experiment so promising, so profound the limits were lifted on the experiment so everyone could benefit.”

“It involves surgery in the womb with tiny instruments, microscopic skill and dexterity on a devastating birth defect that affects 1,500 newborns every year. And Deborah Roberts reports on the news tonight that could lead to other life-changing surgery for babies before they are born.”

article continues at http://www.nationalrighttolifenews.org/news

Thursday, October 17, 2013

Another Fatal Infection After RU-486 Abortion


By Randall K. O’Bannon, Ph.D., NRL-ETF Director of Education & Research

The death of another woman who was chemically aborted using RU-486 has been revealed. A case report on a 31-year old woman in Britain who died in 2010 was published in the July 2013, issue of the Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. The website abortionpillrisks.org brought this case (as it has others) to wider public attention and provided additional details.

As was the case with several other women who underwent a RU-486 abortion, this woman died of a fatal Clostridium infection, though in her case it was the Clostridium septicum variant. As with other species of Clostridium, these anaerobic bacteria are common in the human intestinal tract, but do not normally cause problems unless an area becomes inflamed or necrotic (dead or dying cells).

Though infections are rare, they are sometimes found among patients who have conditions like peripheral vascular disease or diabetes (conditions characterized by poor circulation), or in patients who have experienced some tissue damage due to surgery or trauma such as malignancy, burns, or skin infection. A miscarriage where bacteria enter the uterus can also be a trigger.

continue reading at http://www.nationalrighttolifenews.org




Thursday, October 3, 2013

The Special Privilege of Being the Parent of a Child With Down Syndrome


By Eileen Haupt


October is Down Syndrome Awareness Month. It is a time when scores of advocacy organizations and individuals across the country do their utmost to raise awareness about this genetic condition.

I was thinking about Awareness and how unaware I was about Down syndrome prior to the birth of Sadie, my second daughter, almost 15 years ago. It got me thinking, what are some of the things I would like others to be aware of?

In particular, because such a high percentage of babies diagnosed with Down syndrome are aborted—estimates run as high as 90%– I thought I’d use this post to talk to the mothers carrying babies with Down syndrome. There is so much information available now, but unfortunately a lot of it is misinformation.

So, to the mother who has recently been told by her doctor that her unborn baby has Down syndrome, here’s what I would like her to know:

You will love your baby. Really. You have received many subtle and not so subtle negative messages about individuals with this condition. These messages are distorted; they are not the truth. The truth is that you will fall in love with your baby, just as you would any of your children.

 article continues at http://www.nationalrighttolifenews.org