RICK HINSHAW
Clarke D. Forsythe, Abuse of Discretion: The Inside Story of Roe v. Wade (New York: Encounter Books, 2013)
With his extensive background in law,
Clarke Forsythe, senior counsel at Americans United for Life, seems the
ideal author for a detailed overview of Roe v. Wade. In Abuse of Discretion, he does not disappoint, providing a comprehensive account of how and why the Supreme Court justices used Roe — and its often overlooked but equally significant companion case, Doe v. Bolton — to impose a radical pro-abortion mandate on the entire nation.
Through what he describes as “a
quarter-century of research” – research that included examination of the
papers of eight of the nine justices who decided Roe – Forsythe analyzes Roe and its impact, 40 years later, in the process confirming what many pro-life activists knew instinctively at the time:
- that the ruling was far more sweeping, and radical, than claimed by media and Court members themselves;
- that it resulted not from a comprehensive, reasoned analysis of facts, but from an ideological agenda pushed by the Court’s most activist members;
- that the justices misused, misunderstood and misrepresented pertinent facts in a range of critically relevant areas, from the history of abortion laws, to medical data and developments, to public opinion regarding abortion;
- that instead of a careful, balanced study of empirical data from various perspectives, the justices relied almost exclusively on advocacy pieces produced by pro-abortion activists;
- that the social crises the justices believed legal abortion would help alleviate – poverty, child abuse, out-of-wedlock pregnancies – would grow worse in ensuing decades.
Most disturbing is the justices’ –
especially Justices William O. Douglas and William J. Brennan, Jr. –
manipulation of the judicial process to bring about their fore-ordained
result: a nationwide mandate legalizing abortion.
continue reading at http://www.catholicleague.org
Rick Hinshaw is editor of The Long Island Catholic magazine.
