Showing posts with label Abortion Advocates. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Abortion Advocates. Show all posts

Monday, July 9, 2018

Abortion Advocates Think Amy Barrett is a Member of a “Cult” Because She’s Catholic

"For most Senate Democrats presiding over judicial confirmations, the only good Catholic is a bad one." 


By Micaiah Bilger
Life News


The mudslinging against Judge Amy Coney Barrett, a possible nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court, continued this week with abortion activists claiming she is a member of a “cult.”

She is believed to be one of four candidates that President Donald Trump is considering to fill retiring Justice Anthony Kennedy’s seat.

Particularly abhorrent to abortion activists, Barrett is a devout Catholic, a conservative and a woman.

Abortion supporters have honed in on Barrett’s affiliation with People of Praise, an ecumenical Christian group that focuses on prayer, counseling, marriage guidance and acts of service for families in need. Labeling the group a “cult,” abortion activists claim Barrett is a “dangerous religious extremist” because of her affiliation with the group.

According to Townhall, these attacks are just nonsense:

Her former colleagues on the Notre Dame law school faculty, many of whom have disagreements with Barrett, unanimously endorsed her nomination to the Circuit Court, describing her as “brilliant” and also “generous” and “warm.” …

If Barrett is a glazed-eyed cultist, she’s done an incredible job of hiding it. She fooled her fellow clerks on the Supreme Court when she worked for Justice Antonin Scalia. Dozens of clerks, including some who worked for Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer, endorsed her previous nomination, calling her a “woman of remarkable intellect and character.” 


She fooled her students, hundreds of whom signed an endorsement reading, in part, “Our religious, cultural, and political views span a wide spectrum. Despite the many and genuine differences among us, we are united in our conviction that Professor Barrett would make an exceptional federal judge.” And she fooled all of the Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee along with three Democrats, who voted to approve her nomination [to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit].

Pro-abortion politicians have attacked her faith repeatedly, beginning when President Donald Trump nominated her to the Seventh Circuit.


“For most Senate Democrats presiding over judicial confirmations, the only good Catholic is a bad one,” George Neumayr wrote at the American Spectator. “They will only confirm Catholic nominees who reject authoritative Church teaching in favor of liberalism.”

In September, pro-abortion Democrats barraged Barrett with hostile questions about her faith during the Senate confirmation hearing.

U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s comment “the dogma lives loudly within you, and that’s of concern” later was called out as “bigoted.”

U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin also interrogated Barrett about her use of the term “orthodox Catholics” in an article that she wrote.


“Do you consider yourself an orthodox Catholic?” Durbin asked.
“If you’re asking whether I take my faith seriously and I’m a faithful Catholic, I am,” she replied. “Although I would stress that my personal church affiliation or my religious belief would not bear on the discharge of my duties as a judge.”

At another point, Barrett added: “Were I confirmed as a judge, I would decide cases according to the rule of law beginning to end. In the rare circumstance that might ever arise, I can’t imagine one sitting here now, where I felt some contentious objection to the law, I would recuse. I would never impose my own personal convictions upon the law.”

Legal scholars on the political left and right both have blasted the criticisms as unfounded and unjust. Planned Parenthood’s lobbying against Barrett’s 2017 nomination was so deceptive that several liberal law professors urged the abortion group to retract its false statements against her.


Saturday, April 29, 2017

1973: The Year Humanists, Eugenicists, and Abortion Advocates Joined Forces


By Carole Novielli
Live Action News


The Humanist Manifesto was a document written in rejection of orthodox teaching on religion and the existence of God and was signed by several prominent leaders in the abortion movement. 

In 1933, 34 humanists, including John Dewey, gathered together to write the radical Humanist Manifesto 1, which came at a time when eugenic philosophy was dominating culture. It rode in on the heels of Hitler’s reign of terror in Nazi Germany and preceded, by just a few short years, the very first committee on euthanasia (National Society for the Legalization of Euthanasia), put together by several members of Margaret Sanger’s American Birth Control League as well as members of the American Eugenics Society.

Interestingly enough, in 1957, Sanger received the “Humanist of the Year” award.  In 1973, 40 years after the first Manifesto was penned, Humanist Manifesto II was drafted. This Manifesto came at a time when overpopulation, birth control, and abortion were prominent concerns, and it is reflected in the text of the document:

We reject all religious, ideological, or moral codes that denigrate the individual, suppress freedom, dull intellect, dehumanize personality. We believe in maximum individual autonomy… the possibilities of individual freedom of choice exist in human life and should be increased….
The right to birth control, abortion and divorce should be recognized… a civilized society should be a tolerant one. The insertion of abortion into Humanist Manifesto 11 attracted leaders in the movement who signed onto the Humanist ideology.

Signers included:

  • Alan F. Guttmacher, president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America.
  • Norman Fleishman, executive vice president of Planned Parenthood World Population, Los Angeles
  • Lawrence Lader, chairman of the National Association for Repeal of Abortion Laws (which later became NARAL)
  • Henry Morgentaler, M.D., Canadian abortionist and past president of Humanist Association of Canada
  • Betty Friedan, founder of N.O.W., who was later granted the “Humanist of the Year” award in 1975
Manifestos I and II rejected God and attempted to outline how humans could work to save themselves from the ills of society.

Book Cover: Humanist Manifesto
1 and 11 edited by Paul Kurtz
Paul Kurtz, who published the Manifestos in 1973, wrote about this in his preface:

As in 1933, humanists still believe that traditional theism, especially faith in the prayer-hearing God, assumed to love and care for persons…is an unproved and outmoded faith…. Reasonable minds look to other means for survival.


Manifesto II reinforced the belief that God and religion were to be ignored while human reasoning was to be exalted:

We believe… that traditional dogmatic or authoritative religions that place revelation, God, ritual, or creed above human needs and experience do a disservice to the human species…. As nontheists, we begin with humans not God….”

Blogger's Note:  The common denominator in socialism, communism, fascism and modern day progressivism has, at its roots, godlessness and a pagan worldview. Hence, the ultimate acceptance and approval of the worst of sins, premeditated murder of unborn babies.

Believing in "maximum individual autonomy" is the antithesis of the Truth in the Word of God.  This godless philosophy is self-destructive for individuals and nations.  History has recorded over many millennia the downfall of civilizations who rejected or denied the existence of God and made themselves god.