Showing posts with label Dementia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dementia. Show all posts

Thursday, June 28, 2018

Hospital Staff Caught Euthanizing Hundreds of Patients: “If a Nurse Didn’t Like You, You Were a Goner”

“Exactly the same cause of death was routinely given by those doctors involved in the “life-shortening” of the mentally incapacitated in Germany in 1939-41.”


By Society for the Protection of Unborn Children
Life News


More details are emerging of the scandal in which at least 450, and probably more than 650, people’s lives were ended as a result of being given dangerous amounts of unnecessary opiates.


Shocking Statistics

The report of The Gosport Independent Panel into Gosport War Memorial Hospital found that only 45% of those administered terminal quantities of diamorphine (which can be appropriate in alleviating severe pain at the very end of life) were said to be in pain. Many of the case studies showed that even where pain was noted, it was not properly assessed, and the effect of medication was not monitored.

In 29% of cases, no reason or rationale was given for prescribing the lethal doses. In 26%, reasons were given that would “rarely, if ever, be regarded as appropriate indications,” such as deterioration, distress, or agitation.

Nurses Euthanising Difficult Patients

Writing in the Times, Dominic Lawson points out that “the ones most likely to get the treatment appeared to be not the sickest, but the most ‘difficult’. As the stepson of one of the victims remarked: ‘If a nurse didn’t like you, you were a goner.'”

This is clear from the testimony of whistle-blower Pauline Spilker, who said: “It appeared to me then and more so now that euthanasia was practised by the nursing staff. I cannot offer an explanation as to why I did not challenge what I saw at that time . . . I feel incredibly guilty.”


Euthanasiast Culture

In addition to the case she described of an 80 year old man who was active and mentally alert but “difficult” there were other cases of tricky patients being quietened with non-clinically indicated opiates. Dr Barton, who was responsible for the prescribing on the wards, defended the use of diamorphine on a lady with dementia who was “not [in] physical pain but not happy, not comfortable, not easy to look after.” Commenting on a report condoning her actions, the panel said: 
“This is an extraordinary conclusion, explicitly condoning the use of large doses of diamorphine simply to control symptoms of confusion and agitation, contrary to all relevant guidance.”
Patient with Learning Difficulties Killed

Dominic Lawson highlights a case that he, as the father of an adult with Down’s syndrome, finds particularly shocking – that of 78-year-old Ethel Thurston, who had learning difficulties, and was admitted with a fractured femur.

At another hospital, the doctor assessed her as having the “physical potential to remobilise” and she was admitted to Gosport War Memorial Hospital for rehabilitation, care and mobilisation. Within days, Dr Barton wrote on her notes “please keep comfortable. I am happy for nursing staff to confirm death.” 

These euphemistic words appeared on many patients’ records, despite them for the most part being admitted for respite or rehabilitation, not end of life care. 

The panel also found that the medical team were putting patients onto end of life pathways without proper consultation with them or their families. (Concerns over practices such as these have been raised in the last few years in connection with the now infamous Liverpool Care Pathway and its successors.)

Where Have We Seen This Before?

Miss Thurston was put on high doses of diamorphine and midazolam (the panel noted that the “starting dose of diamorphine was excessive, at least three times the recommended dose equivalent” and it could find no clinical indication for the drugs at all) and died seven hours later.

The cause was said to be “bronchopneumonia”. Almost all these deaths were attributed to pneumonia, without any further explanation.

As Dominic Lawson notes: “Exactly the same cause of death was routinely given by those doctors involved in the “life-shortening” of the mentally incapacitated in Germany in 1939-41.”

LifeNews Note: Courtesy of SPUC. The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children is a leading pro-life organization in the United Kingdom.

Blogger's Note:  A Holocaust Against Humanity

If a baby is not safe within the shelter of its mother's womb, then no one is safe. 

The 'slippery slope" after Roe v. Wade legalized abortion has come to pass. A culture of death is taking root even in the medical community. The Hippocratic Oath has become irrelevant among some in the medical profession.  

We are becoming a utilitarian society where only the healthy and productive will be allowed to live. This 'Holocaust against Humanity' is the evil that results when man becomes God.  

Wherever God's Truth prevails and His grace, love and power resides in the souls of men, peace reigns in a nation.  Pray for an end to abortion and a return to peace through Christ, the Prince of Peace.

Monday, April 23, 2018

Study Finds Hundreds of Mentally Ill and Dementia Patients Euthanized Without Consent



By Alex Schadenberg
Life News


An important study was published in the Journal BMC Medical Ethics (March 5)examining nine euthanasia deaths of people with intellectual disabilities in the Netherlands.

The purpose of the study was to examine:

How do physicians and the Dutch regional euthanasia review committees operationalise the EAS due care criteria for patients who have an intellectual disability and/or autism spectrum disorder? What, if any, are the particular difficulties when the EAS due care criteria are applied to these patient groups?

For more information about euthanasia from a disability perspective go to the disability rights group – Not Dead Yet.

According to the 2017 Annual euthanasia report, there were 6585 reported euthanasia deaths in the Netherlands in 2017. and of those, 252 of them were people who died by euthanasia for psychiatric reasons or for dementia.

The study acknowledges the growth in euthanasia for psychiatric reasons in the Netherlands:

There were 2 reported cases in 2010, 42 in 2013, and 60 in 2016. EAS for mental suffering has been fiercely debated. Arguments have focused on the difficulty of assessing the patient’s subjective perception and complaints and on the challenges in assessing the patient’s capacity of judgement, which may be impaired by psychiatric conditions such as severe depression.

There were 83 people who died by euthanasia for mental suffering in 2017.

The study examined 416 Netherlands euthanasia case summaries uncovering 9 cases of a person with an intellectual disability or autism spectrum. These cases are examined in the study.

The nine euthanasia deaths included 6 woman and 3 men of varying ages. Of the 9 deaths by euthanasia, 6 of the people had intellectual disabilities, 2 were identified as Asperger’s syndrome and one was identified as autism spectrum disorder.

Three cases referred to family involvement, the other cases didn’t include family information. One case stated that the person lived in a psychogeriatric unit while another case indicated that the person lived alone, while the other cases didn’t refer to living conditions. Six cases referred to a previous admission to a psychiatric in-patient setting and there were several references to loneliness and social isolation

The initial request was usually made to the GP. In six cases the GP refused, in three of the refusals, the GP did not support euthanasia and the other three cases the physician thought that the case was too complex or that the person did not qualify for euthanasia. In all of the six refusals, the person went to the “End of life Clinic” (euthanasia clinic) for approval.

Tuesday, February 7, 2017

Struggling Woman with Dementia Euthanized in Netherlands




By Michael Cook
National Right to Life

A Dutch doctor has been rebuked by a Regional Review Committee after she gave a lethal injection to a demented patient who appeared to be struggling to stop the procedure.

The incident emerged when the Regional Review Committee released euthanasia case reports on January 1. This was Verdict 2016-85.

Here is what happened. An 80-year-old woman with dementia entered a nursing home because her husband could no longer care for her. When the woman was still lucid she expressed two wishes: (a) not to go into a “home for demented elderly” and (b) to be euthanized “when I myself find it the right time.”

She was unhappy in the nursing home and wandered the corridors at night. After seven weeks of this, the nursing home doctor decided that she must be suffering unbearably. Based on her previous statements, the doctor decided that euthanasia was appropriate.

With members of her family in attendance, the doctor approached to give her a lethal injection. The woman was agitated, so the doctor slipped a sedative into her coffee. This did not work, so she gave her an injection. With all these drugs, the woman dosed off.

But when the needle for the lethal injection appeared, she started to struggle. The doctor had to ask the family members to hold her down so that she could continue with the injection. The woman died soon afterward.
The review committee said the doctor acted in good faith, but that she had erred in several respects. First, she was deceptive when she drugged the woman’s the coffee. Second, she should have stopped when the woman started to resist. Third, the wording of the advance directive was not clear enough and did not authorize the doctor to perform euthanasia.

The Committee recommended that the case should go to court to clarify whether the doctor acted properly.