Tuesday, January 29, 2013

THE MEDIA IS THE MASSAGE


By Joe Wall

No, that isn't a misspelling; it's meant to convey the idea that the media, in all its forms but especially television, is the dominant force in our society; that it massages and lulls people into a false sense of reality.  It's a kind of electronic equivalent of the "soma" of Aldous Huxley's novel, Brave New World: intended to keep the masses entertained and quiet, unable to engage in independent thought.

With few exceptions, the people of this country see the world through the huge "eye" in their living room. They see what this "eye" wants them to see and to understand it in the way the "eye" wants them to understand it.  A marvelous instrument of social control; it's far more efficient than secret police, jails, all that sort of thing; although these are still necessary for those recalcitrants who ignore their master's commands.

The media is, besides the courts, the main reason the Abortion Holocaust has been fastened on this country as an alien growth, an ugly moral cancer.  As we know, the media presents a false picture of the Life issue; plainly put, IT LIES.

Perhaps even worse, it fails to report abortion news although, in any objective sense, the struggle between the pro-life and pro-death forces is the greatest single event of the century.  Millions of babies are being smothered, one might say, under a blanket of ignorance, carefully fostered by the all-powerful media.

Some of us have thought that if pro-lifers had control of the media for just six months, enabling them to present the truth, that at the end of that period abortion would be, literally, a dead issue in this country.  People would be so outraged when they saw the truth that had been hidden from them for so long they would be tempted to go out and lynch the abortionists.

What to do?

As fare as the hardcore pro-life activists are concerned, they've read the books, and brochures; they get the pro-life newsletters; they know what the truth is.  They are well aware of the way the secular media lies and distorts the pro-life story. They've been to the abortuaries; they've talked to the victims and know the horrible  reality the media never shows.

The second group are the ordinary Catholic and Evangelical people.  Through their churches, religious newspapers, magazines, radio and TV shows, they have a better idea of the abortion truth than the average man in the street, who is exposed only to the secular media.  Even so, after all these years there is still a vast amount of ignorance among our Catholic and Evangelical people. After all, they also watch the nightly TV shows and read the daily newspapers...and they are affected by them!  It still surprises me to hear some of the things good, churchgoing people say about abortion and the Life issue in general, things that show they unthinkingly have absorbed the anti-life propaganda peddled by the secular media.

Beyond these two groups is the great mass of American people.  They are prisoners - mental prisoners - of the media.  They uncritically accept whatever the media tells them.

Remember, these are the people who elected that transparent mountebank and crook Bill Clinton, not once but twice, who kept "LaVerne and Shirley" on the TV for eight long years! We can't expect too much form them. The 'good' thing about them is that they really don't care about abortion, one way or the other; they really don't care much about anything unless it impinges on them directly.  They are content with their simple pleasures; content to dram their lives away.  If we win (I should say, WHEN we win), they will accept us as cheerfully as they now accept our present secular-humanist ruling class.

What does all this mean?  What must we do from here on out to advance the Pro-Life cause among these three groups of Americans, remembering that the lives of untold millions hand in the balance?

Regarding the hardcore pro-life activists, there isn't much that can or should be done.  Being what they are, they will continue to work and to educate themselves so that they may educate others.  We should, however, make sure that newcomers to the ranks of these activists are made aware of the immense resources available and to make use of them - "an educated pro-lifer is an effective pro-lifer."

As for the third group (the "great gray herd" as someone called them" they are, for the present, largely out of our reach. We will be able to affect them when we take over the media (don't laugh, stranger things have happened!)

Right now, the best we can do is "damage control." We must keep after the media constantly to give us at least a modicum of fair play.  We should carp and complain to them all the time, raise cain about their biased and unfair news stories and TV shows, keep them looking over their shoulders whenever they thouch on anything involving the Pro-Life issue.

Beyond, that, we must do whatever we can to destroy the American people's belief and confidence in the secular media.

We must concentrate our slender resources on the second group; the "believing" Catholic and Evangelical people. These folk are halfway there.  our efforts to reach them must be greatly expanded.  They will listen to us and understand us if we can get to them.  We must use our ingenuity to work out ways of doing this. One example of how than be done is though Voices for the Unborn.

Joe Wall is a long time pro-life activists who has been involved in many areas of the pro-life movement.

25 MARCHES FOR LIFE

Laura and her family attended this year's March for Life in Washington, DC
By Laura Gies



My first March for Life was in 1987.  I was an undergraduate architecture major at Catholic University, right in Washington, DC.  I had sort of vaguely noticed in the previous years around late January, that on one day in particular flocks and flocks of people would walk across our campus from the Shrine of the Immaculate Conception to the Metro Station on the edge of our campus.

This is sort of sad to say, but I was somewhat clueless about what all those people were doing walking across my college campus.

Then during the 1986-87 school year, I was in the midst of a strong awakening of my Faith and was getting to know a new group of friends on campus who were praying the Rosary and having a prayer gathering in front of the Blessed Sacrament.  This group of friends in Christ invited me to join them for the March for Life.  As it approached that year, I knew that I was not going to be allowed to miss my classes that day, and I also began to wonder, why on earth didn't the entire college of Catholic U. just shut down so that ALL the students could attend the March without missing class-time.

Well, as it turned out, there was a HUGE snowstorm that day!  And all classes were indeed canceled! But guess what was NOT CANCELED??  The March for Life!   So, I happily dressed in layers, and joined my friends in my first March for Life!  It was the most adventurous walk in DC I had ever had!

About 2 years later, in 1989, I went back to DC during the March for Life, but this time I joined a new movement called "Operation Rescue" and that day, I sat down in front of an abortion clinic door for the first time in my life with several dozen others and we happily kept the clinic from opening and amazingly were not arrested, as a promise was struck with the police to have the clinic manager agree to remain closed all day and then we would peacefully get up and walk away.  And that is what we did!  No babies died there that day and no one was arrested!

When we had walked away from that "rescue" then we went to downtown DC and joined the end of the March for Life!

In January 1990, for the 3rd time, I was headed to DC to the March for Life.  This time I had met a guy! We went together to the Shrine the day before the March for Life and stayed at the Shrine of the Immaculate Conception for the all night prayer vigil.  We slept on the basement crypt floor of the Shrine with many others, including dozens of seminarians, near the sarcophagus of a deceased bishop. We got up the next day and again blocked the doors of an abortion clinic in Washington, DC. Then we joined what was left of the March for Life.

In January 1991, the guy, Walt Gies, and I were now newly married!  This time and for several years after we continued the routine of going to DC the night before the March for Life, staying at the Shrine, or eventually with a good friend in the area, attending the Mass in the evening at the Shrine, and then going to a local abortion clinic in DC area that was having a rescue, then joining the March for Life in progress.

In January 1993, we were very excited to know we were expecting our first child, when we went to the March for Life.  Sadly, only 1-1/2 months later, this baby was lost in an early miscarriage.  A painful experience of pregnancy loss that made me very sensitive to what an abortive mother might feel.

In January 1995, we were "with child" again during the March for Life, but as yet were unaware...! Our firstborn, JohnPaul, arrived in October of that year, and of course in January 1996, we packed our little 3 month old boy in a sling and walked the March for the first time ever with our own precious baby!

After that, each year, we have had a growing gang of Gies kids coming to the March for Life with us... Jan 1997:  I was 2 weeks away from giving birth to the 2nd born, Tommy, and was too naive to realize that walking that March was cutting it real real close to giving birth in DC!

Jan 1998:  we brought our 2 sons in a double stroller to the March for Life, and had just learned that a new baby was on the way -- another child attending "in-utero"!   Our 1st daughter arrived in August that year.

Jan 1999:  now we had the double stroller with 3 yr old, a near 2 yr old, and a 5 month-old child in a backpack or sling during the March for Life!

Jan 2000:  this year, I was again "great with child" but at least there was a good 2 months to go, so I did the whole walk, with the 3 kids and my husband, striding thru it 7 months pregnant.  Leo was born in March 2000.

Jan 2001, 2002:  with 4 children, all preschool aged, or kindergartener, we were now bringing a double stroller AND our wagon!

Jan 2003:  God granted us the blessing of one more baby on the way, but this time my due date was the end of January or early February..... so, for the first time in all those years, I stayed home!  Walt took the 4 children and  managed without me!

Jan 2004: Five children, ages 7, almost 6, 5, almost 4, and 1 year old were loaded into a new double stroller and the wagon, and a backpack --- and we did the March One More Time!!

Jan 2005:  Another child was on the way!  At age 40, I was expecting our 6th born baby and had just found out before that year's March for Life.  This time we did something special, we'd been wanting to do for years:  stayed with an Aunt and Uncle of my husband's in Northern Virginia.  We spent the day before the March, walking around DC and the museums, during a gentle snowfall.  What a nice time to enjoy some pretty art with my then 6 year old daughter, while Dad took the boys to the Air and Space museum.  When we woke up early in the morning to pack up and get ready for daily Mass at our Uncle's parish, unfortunately, something was not right, I was spotting!  It was just like the very first pregnancy that was lost in miscarriage.... and I was devastated!  We called my OB in Philadelphia, and the staff let me know that Dr. Brigida was on her way to DC for the March for Life... they called her and she told them to tell me NOT to go to the March and to stay still and rest, then to come see her the next day in Philly.  Walt then took the 5 children to the March without me, while I stayed with his Aunt and Uncle, resting and watching the March on EWTN.  I ended up having no more spotting and the next day was diagnosed as having "low progesterone" but a strong pregnancy and was going to have a regular monitoring of the progesterone.  What a Divine Providence to have had a caring Aunt to stay with during that day!  And to have "been there" and for our children to have not missed the March afterall.  Walt came back to his Aunt and Uncle's house, got me, and then we all drove home to Pennsylvania.  I ended up needing progesterone shots twice a week for the entire pregnancy almost!  I had to see my doctor every two weeks, have blood tests to make sure all was well.  Our Sara arrived safe and sound in September!

Jan 2006:  SIX CHILDREN and Walt and Laura went to the March for Life together!  1 double stroller, 1 wagon, 1 backpack and 1 sling -- carrying that baby girl all the way in my arms!

Jan 2007:  What a difference 1 year made for Sara:  when she was only 16 months old, our Sara-girl ran the entire March for Life!  She would not stay in the stroller, and she wanted to hold mommy's hand, and she walked and jogged and raced thru the crowd, pulling me with her, as we left Walt in the dust with the other 5 children!!  Sara and I made it to the Supreme Court steps at least an hour before Walt and the others!!

Jan 2008: Again we traveled with all 6 children and the stroller, wagon and a backpack.... some of the older kids were now walking the entire walk, but it sure is helpful to have a wagon to let tired ones rest!

Jan 2009: This year, we had stopped homeschooling and 4 of our children were a part of a new academy, and we worked at trying to march together.  We also brought one of our favorite teachers with us to the March, Miss P!   It was nice for our older kids to find their friends and walk together with them.

Jan 2010: This year, we made a banner for the Regina Luminis Academy to hold up and walk behind at the March!

Jan 2011:  Our parish had a bus and the older parishioners running the bus wanted us to "take over" running the bus.... We did this!  In 2012 we did it again and we just finished doing it one more time this Jan 25, 2013.

Laura's husband, Walter, and family at this year's  March for Life

The main experience that I like to reflect on after 25+ Marches for Life is that I see the change.
The change is real.  The change is not going away.  What is the change?

It is that many many more young people of this next generation will not allow abortion to be the way.
There is no way that these 100's of thousands that have come from so many states, so many 100's if not 1000's of miles away to March on DC to gently but firmly protest the Roe V. Wade decision of 1973, will ever "change their minds" to be pro-abortion.  There are way too many young people who "get it" about abortion being wrong and this is the change.

As much as the media led mantra of "abortion is good, abortion is a right" seem to be prevailing, the young kids coming the March for Life will completely trash this mentality when they are the ones in charge in the next 50 years.  I pray that something current and NOW causes the change to take hold sooner than 50 years, like more and more live ultrasounds getting media attention, and the many "right to life at conception" legislative initiatives working their way thru now, but I know that it is impossible for these fresh eyes, ears and hearts of the children who have escaped death via abortion in the past 40 years, to remain silent and THEY are going to put an end to this ridiculous illogic that is keeping a fragile grip of death on our current times and culture.  The Culture of Life is the change that I see on the horizon that is ALREADY HERE and there simply is no turning back for them!!  Amen!

'Meet Mary'





http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/abbott/130128

Monday, January 28, 2013

Pro-Life Reflections for January 29






Reflection:

Ginette Paris wrote a book called "The Sacrament of Abortion."  She claims that abortion is a scared ritual sacrifice to the goddess Artemis.

As patroness of animals and of hunters,  Artemis represents the ability to both protect and kill.  The so-called right to abortion means that the mother can give either life or death to her child.

Prayer:

Lord, free your people from the deception of idolatry, witchcraft, and false worship.  Preserve us in true worship and effective justice.





Susan B Anthony List Wins Court Victory



A federal judge has tossed out the lawsuit filed by ex-Congressman Steve Driehaus – a self-described “pro-life” Democrat – who sued the SBA List for defamation and “loss of livelihood” after they exposed his vote for taxpayer funding of abortion in Obamacare to his constituents during the 2010 election cycle.

And now, because of our victory, politicians are going to think twice before betraying unborn children. 

 This case was designed by their opponents so they could get their hands on their confidential documents and e-mails, bury them in legal bills, throw Marjorie Dannenfelser  in jail, and ultimately -- shut them down. 


Why?

Because they stood up for the unborn and defeated 15 of 20 “pro-life” Democrats who caved and handed Nancy Pelosi and President Obama the votes they needed to pass taxpayer funding of abortion in Obamacare. 

Instead of closing their doors, they are more emboldened than ever in their mission.

Just take a look at the March for Life and the 500,000+ pro-lifers who braved freezing temperatures to be a voice for unborn children and their mothers.

Try suing all of them!

… We will not be silenced.
… We will not be intimidated.
… We will continue to hold politicians accountable.
… We will never stop being a voice for the voiceless!

The Texas Woman Who Should be Dead



There is a 43-year-old woman, born in Texas, who should be dead right now. In fact, she should have never been born. Forty years ago, the Supreme Court decided that the Texas law that prevented Jane Roe from ending the life of her unborn daughter was unconstitutional. But by the time the Supreme Court issued its decision in 1973, she had already been born and adopted by a family—likely not knowing that all that ink spilled in Roe v. Wade was about her.

Norma McCorvey is “Jane Roe.” She claimed then that her pregnancy was the result of a rape, although for over a decade now she has been outspokenly pro-life and publicly admitted that this, and virtually every fact on which her case was built, was a lie. Both McCorvey and Sandra Cano, the Doe of Doe v. Bolton—Roe’s companion case from Georgia decided the same day—are now outspoken pro-life advocates who have sworn that their cases are built on lies.

But before the Supreme Court could decide whether McCorvey did have a constitutional right to end her unborn daughter’s life, it had to overcome a procedural obstacle that slowed down the process—a delay that factored into whether her daughter would ever have a family.

Because of that delay, McCorvey had already had the child by the time the Supreme Court issued its decision in January 1973. She had been adopted into a Texas home, perhaps somewhere in the Dallas area where McCorvey lived. The court nevertheless said that McCorvey’s case was not moot since her circumstances were “capable of repetition” because courts would never be able to decide the question during the time of a woman’s pregnancy.

Procedural history is never the exciting part of a lawsuit. But for McCorvey’s unborn daughter, the dry complexity of legal procedure is the reason she exists today. Fortunately for a three-year old girl, “the wheels of justice grind slowly,” and by the time the court issued its decision, a Texas family had adopted her. If the courts could have moved more quickly, she (and her family) would have never had that chance. Lemonade comes from lemons.

 story continues here


What the Liberal Media Fears Most: 500,000 March for Life 2013

Good Council Homes



Good Counsel Homes is a ministry which helps homeless pregnant mothers, with or without other children, return to school, find jobs and take the next good step in life.

Good Counsel is a family for those in need, serving God who is the Father of the orphan, defender of the widow, and who gives the lonely a home to live in (Psalm 68). Our Lord's call to serve the disadvantaged compels us to advocate on behalf of single mothers and their children and to offer love, shelter, and the opportunity to grow in self-respect and independence. We invoke the patronage of Mary, the Lady of Good Counsel, to help us protect mothers in need and to love their children from the moment of conception.

Good Counsel, a nationally recognized nonprofit, was founded in Hoboken, NJ by Father Benedict Groeschel, CFR, and Christopher Bell.


Chris’ Story

While working with homeless runaways in New York's Times Square, Christopher Bell became troubled. He saw many single pregnant women on the streets who were pregnant and with seemingly nowhere to turn. One day Chris made a remark to his spiritual director, Father Benedict Groeschel, "Somebody should do something to help these pregnant women!" Father Benedict looked Chris directly in the eyes and said, "You are right Chris! And you are that somebody!" With that encouragement, Good Counsel was born.

Chris and Father Benedict found an abandoned convent in Hoboken, New Jersey and in March 1985, the first home for mothers and children opened its doors. Since 1985, more than 3,500 women and children have received residential help at Good Counsel.

In addition to the basics of food, clothing and shelter, single mothers benefit from many "life skill" programs including parenting classes, nutrition, career guidance, chastity teaching, spirituality and budgeting. Daycare is available in each home so that a mother may work or return to school to complete her education.




 


Americans defend life by hundreds of thousands


This week marked 40 years since the Supreme Court legalized abortion through the Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton decisions. On Friday, hundreds of thousands of pro-life activists descended upon Washington to announce they are still working to overturn the decisions and spread the message that all human life is to be cherished and defended.
Fr. Frank Pavone is president at Priests for Life and an active leader in the pro-life movement and at the March for Life. He told WND the massive crowd on a snowy, blustery day sends a clear message.
“Just to give some perspective, the rally ended just after 1 p.m., and the march began and we still see no end to the crowd,” said Pavone, nearly three hours after the march began.
Once the march reached the Supreme Court, some 70 women who had abortions began sharing their testimonies of regret for having terminated their pregnancies.
As for the pro-life agenda in the coming year, Pavone said one major goal is to explain to Americans what Roe v. Wade is and what it isn’t.
“A lot of people think they support Roe v. Wade because they think it only allows abortions in the first trimester of pregnancy or only in certain extreme circumstances,” Pavone said. “But once we let them know two things, then things begin to change. No. 1, that Roe v. Wade allows abortions under any and all circumstances throughout all nine months of pregnancy. And No. 2, what an abortion actually is. The medical textbooks call it decapitation and dismemberment, very disturbing words that don’t come from pro-life people but come from the actual practitioners of abortion.”
Pavone admitted passing pro-life legislation in Washington will be next to impossible as long as President Obama is in the White House and Democrats control the U.S. Senate. He said pro-life Americans should continue encouraging House Republicans to stand strong against efforts to advance further pro-choice laws.
On the other hand, Pavone said pro-life governors and state legislatures are in place in at least half of U.S. states, and real progress could be seen at that level.
“We’ve got 33 pro-life governors across America, and we’ve got half of the states that have legislatures that are completely pro-life, which means that the leeway the courts have given to the states in passing reasonable measures like parental involvement, more informed consent clinic regulations,” said Pavone. “In some states, now, abortion is banned after 20 weeks on the state level because of the fact that children in the womb can feel pain. These kinds of measures, even in the current climate, have a lot of hope of passing in this particular year.”
The 2012 campaign focused more than usual on abortion, as the Obama campaign made it a centerpiece of its efforts to attract women, along with the federal mandate that employers cover all costs for contraception. Opponents of that agenda were accused of waging a war on women. Pavone said it’s exactly the opposite.
“The war on women, first of all, is when you tear them apart in the womb. Secondly, those who are standing here next to me are women who bought this product of abortion thinking it would be helpful to them, and they experienced exactly the opposite,” he said. “That’s the sad thing about the ideology we hear coming from the Democratic Party. They don’t listen to the women who have had abortions. They certainly don’t want to describe what an abortion is.
“So the war on women is a war that is making them believe the lie that abortion is something good. There’s no disease abortion cures. There’s no medical benefit to the procedure, but when women believe that there is, they end up standing here, as so many are right now, saying, ‘I regret my abortion.’”
Pavone said other reasons for pro-life optimism include the movement getting younger and younger, and he said he’s confident that 40 years from now, the unborn will once again be fully protected by law.

More

What TV news won't tell you about March for Life


Study claims networks twisting abortion coverage to push agenda


As hundreds of thousands descend upon D.C. this weekend for the March for Life, expect television news crews – one journalist’s study suggests – to deliberately slant the story.
According to LifeNews.com’s Katie Yoder, a study of the last 10 years of TV news reports on the annual march – which demands an end to legalized abortion and a right to life be recognized for the unborn – reveals 91 percent of ABC, NBC and CBS anchor reports dodge even mentioning the point of the march: the word “life.”
 Cont. Reading