Abortion Advocates React to Gosnell Verdict
By Rebecca Hamilton
“They” are spinning the Gosnell verdict as best they can.
“They’ve”
filed lawsuits against pro life legislation. “They’ve” lobbied — often
successfully — to kill bills that would require abortionists to have
hospital privileges, to give women informed consent before
performing an abortion, to require parental notification before doing an
elective abortion on a minor. They’ve fought bills that would allow
the state to file murder charges on the life of the baby as well as the
mother when a pregnant woman is murdered.
I could go on. And on.
With the exception of requiring abortionists to have hospital
privileges, the things I’ve just described happened with bills that I
authored and that became law in Oklahoma. Abortion advocates fought
these bills and then attacked me viciously for having authored them. I
could easily multiply these things out to cover every legislature in
this country.
Based on this, I believe that “they” do not want any limits
on what an abortionist can do to babies, or for that matter, to
women. So, it wasn’t any big surprise to me when “they” chimed in with
non-sequitur verbal claptrap after the Gosnell verdict today. Their
comments today were just an extension of the blab they’ve been blabbing
throughout this trial.
During her tenure in the Oklahoma Legislature, Rep. Hamilton has been an
advocate for human rights, believing that government must support and
defend the sanctity of all human lives, from conception to natural
death.
No comments:
Post a Comment