From Tony Perkins
Family Research Council
Sending in your taxes shouldn't mean signing over
your beliefs. But when it comes to issues like abortion, that's exactly what
the Obama administration is asking America to do. As pro-lifers, we have fought
to give the medical community a way out of procedures they object to. As
taxpayers, we deserve that same protection. No one should be forced into
partnership with an industry that spills the blood of innocent unborn humans.
And if Congressmen Chris Smith (R-N.J.) and Dan Lipinski (D-Ill.) get their way,
no one will.
For years, they've been fighting to build a wall
between taxpayer dollars and pro-abortion programs. In 2011, their "No
Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act" sailed through the House only to die at
the Senate's front door. This year, the duo is trying again. With more than 145
co-sponsors, H.R. 7 would ensure that you and I aren't reluctant shareholders
in the nation's abortion business -- in ObamaCare, domestic spending, and even
foreign aid.
Yesterday, the House debated the bill in a feisty
hearing of the House Judiciary Subcommittee. As always, emotions were close to
the surface as the two parties sniped back and forth on the need for such a
law. Not surprisingly, Democrats spent most of their time trying to persuade
people that the bill would somehow ban abortion. Don't believe it. In fact, the
legislation explicitly states that anyone who wants health insurance with
abortion coverage or supplemental abortion coverage can purchase it -- just not
with federal dollars.
Congressman Jerrold Nadler (R-N.Y.), who never
misses an opportunity to mislead people on abortion-neutral legislation,
insisted that "H.R. 7 is a radical departure from current tax treatment of
medical expenses and insurance coverage, and it is neither justifiable nor
necessary to prevent federal funding of abortion." No, Rep. Robert
Goodlatte (R-Va.) fired back, "The real radical departure here is the fact
that now we will have, for the first time, federal subsidies of health
insurance policies [that include abortion] in America."
With ObamaCare barreling down the track, people on
both sides of the issue recognize the importance of pulling the plug on
taxpayer-involvement. At last check, a whopping 67% of Americans agreed.
Unfortunately for them, the health care law has only entangled taxpayers deeper
in the web of abortion. From the government's abortion surcharge to the
abortion-heavy D.C. plans (which FRC's own Anna Higgins exposed), Americans are
more implicated than ever in the procedure that a majority oppose.
Another one of the Left's convenient talking points
is that the country doesn't need H.R. 7 because it has the Hyde Amendment
(which strips taxpayer-funding of abortion in appropriations bills). But unlike
H.R. 7, the Hyde Amendment has to be reauthorized every year to stay in effect.
The "No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act" would save Congress from
that annual fight and create a permanent, government-wide ban on abortion
funding -- not just for appropriations bills, but health care bills, overseas
aid, and anything else that Congress subsidizes. Susan Woods, the Democrats'
witness at Thursday's hearing, also claimed the bill would end private coverage
of abortion -- which is ridiculous on its face. This may come as a shock to
liberals, but just because the government doesn't fund something doesn't mean
it ceases to exist.
Despite what the Left would have you believe, the
Smith-Lipinski measure wouldn't outlaw abortion, it would just make the
government neutral on the question of taxpayer-funding. That's what Americans
want -- and it's what our unborn citizens deserve.
For more on this important conscience preserving
bill and what it could mean for the nation, don't miss next Wednesday's policy
lecture (featured here in the Washington Examiner) at FRC headquarters (801 G
Street, NW, Washington, D.C.) with one of the legislation's sponsors, Rep.
Chris Smith. Click here to register. If the Left wants to know why the GOP is
"still talking about abortion," it's simple. Because Americans are
still forced to fund it! Learn what you can do to change that on January 15.
Foreign taxes will surely not gonna abort tax contribution. Americans living abroad should find expatriate tax services that can handle their taxes and even help them reduce it.
ReplyDelete